Agency Costs, Tax Planning with Emphasis on the Moderating Role of Government Ownership

Authors

https://doi.org/10.22105/tqfb.v1i2.43

Abstract

This research aims to study agency costs and tax planning, emphasizing the moderating role of government ownership. Taxation, as the primary means of raising revenue, can help governments achieve their macroeconomic objectives. Paying taxes is one of the most important tasks citizens can perform to provide financial resources for social welfare. In addition, politically connected companies have an opaque operating environment due to government support, resulting in more significant conflicts of interest and higher agency costs. To achieve this purpose, two hypotheses were formulated. To test these hypotheses, a sample of 142 companies was selected from the companies listed in the Tehran Stock Exchange during 2014-2023. A multivariate regression model was applied using the panel data method. The results of the research hypotheses indicate that agency costs and tax planning have a positive and significant relationship. The results also suggest that government ownership does not affect the relationship between agency costs and tax planning.

Keywords:

Agency costs, Tax planning, Government ownership

References

  1. [1] Rahnamay Roodposhti, F., & Abdolreza, M. (2018). Political connections, dividend and stock return in listed firms on tehran stock exchange. Financial knowledge of security analysis (financial studies), 11(38), 129-144. (In Persian). https://sid.ir/paper/200266/en

  2. [2] Noravesh, E., Karami, G., & Vafi Sani, J. (2009). Investigating the relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and representation costs in companies listed in Tehran stock exchange. Accounting and auditing research, 1(1), 4–27. https://doi.org/10.22034/iaar.2009.105213

  3. [3] Armstrong, C. S., Blouin, J. L., & Larcker, D. F. (2012). The incentives for tax planning. Journal of accounting and economics, 53(1), 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.04.001

  4. [4] Khajavi, S., & Sarvestani, A. (2017). Tax avoidance and agency theory: evidence from Tehran stock exchange (TSE). Management accounting, 10(34), 15-28. (In Persian). https://sid.ir/paper/198805/en

  5. [5] Mehrani, S., & Seyyedi, S. J. (2014). The effect of accounting conservative and tax income on tax avoidance. Journal of accounting knowledge and management auditing, 3(10), 13-39. (In Persian). https://sid.ir/paper/238095/en

  6. [6] Pourheidari, O., & Sarvestani, O. (2013). Identifying and explaining factors affecting tax management. Accounting knowledge, 4(12), 89-110. (In Persian). https://www.ensani.ir/file/download/article/20130901154042-9606-43.pdf

  7. [7] mokhtari, hosein. (2019). Investigating the moderating role of board independence on the relationship between free cash flow and investment efficiency of listed companies in Tehran stock exchange. Journal of accounting and management vision, 2(11), 93–107. https://www.jamv.ir/article_92137.html

  8. [8] Shemshad, A., & Imeni, M. (2022). Cash holding, firm value and performance under financial constraint: a case study of the iranian capital market. Innovation management and operational strategies, 2(4), 434–446. https://doi.org/10.22105/imos.2021.314356.1184

  9. [9] Shackelford, D. A., & Shevlin, T. (2001). Empirical tax research in accounting. Journal of accounting and economics, 31(1), 321–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00022-2

  10. [10] Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500. The journal of finance, 58(3), 1301–1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00567

  11. [11] Arab Salehi, M., & Kazemi Nouri, S. (2014). The impact of agency costs on investment sensitivity – cash flows. Quarterly journal of accounting knowledge, 5(17), 97-118. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/875538/

  12. [12] Heidari, M., Didar, H., & Qaderi, B. (2015). Investigating relationship between agency costs and performance assessment criteria: structural equation modeling approach. Financial accounting, 7(27), 77-101. (In Persian). https://sid.ir/paper/168247/en

  13. [13] Moradi, H. (2018). Investigating the relationship between tax planning, corporate governance and equity value in companies listed on the tehran stock exchange. The second national conference on accounting, management and economics with a sustainable employment approach and its role in industry growth, Tehran, Iran. Civilica. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/844486

  14. [14] Okiro, H. K. M., Mwangi, M., Ochieng, D. E. K. (2020). Mediating effect of agency cost on the relationship between ownership structure and firm value. Journal of finance and investment analysis, 9(3), 1–3. https://ideas.repec.org/a/spt/fininv/v9y2020i3f9_3_3.html

  15. [15] Chen, X., Hu, N., Wang, X., & Tang, X. (2014). Tax avoidance and firm value: evidence from China. Nankai business review international, 5(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-10-2013-0037

  16. [16] Badertscher, B. A., Katz, S. P., & Rego, S. O. (2013). The separation of ownership and control and corporate tax avoidance. Journal of accounting and economics, 56(2), 228–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.08.005

  17. [17] Henry, D. (2010). Agency costs, ownership structure and corporate governance compliance: A private contracting perspective. Pacific-basin finance journal, 18(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2009.05.004

  18. [18] Wang, G. Y., & others. (2010). The impacts of free cash flows and agency costs on firm performance. Journal of service science and management, 3(04), 408. https://www.scirp.org/html/3389.html

  19. [19] Imeni, M., Bao, Z., & Nozick, V. (2024). Multiscale partial correlation analysis of tehran stock market indices: clustering and inter-index relationships. Journal of operational and strategic analytics, 2(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.56578/josa020101

Published

2024-12-28

How to Cite

Shemshad, A., Fazl, S., & Pirouz, F. (2024). Agency Costs, Tax Planning with Emphasis on the Moderating Role of Government Ownership. Transactions on Quantitative Finance and Beyond, 1(2), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.22105/tqfb.v1i2.43

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.