The Importance of Supply Chain Integration in Environmental Performance: A mediation-moderation model of Knowledge Combination, Resilience and Green Innovation

Authors

https://doi.org/10.22105/tqfb.v2i2.66

Abstract

Nowadays, Green Supply Chain (GSC) networks are developed as essential components in the commerce strategy. Producing green products is an instance of environmental achievements worldwide, such that ecological statistics show that consumers avoid buying products that emit pollution during production. Therefore, pursuing sustainability approaches in Supply Chain Management (SCM) turns into a fundamental issue. In the present article, we discuss the role of supply chain integration on the environment using Knowledge Combination (KC), Green Innovation (GI), and the mediating role of reactive and Proactive Dimensions (PDs) of resilience. The current study is a quantitative descriptive-correlational research with an applied purpose. The research population analysis is available to experts in the supply chain field. The research findings are expressed in the variance-based structural equation approach and the Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural network approach. Accordingly, supplier integration improves resilience and environmental performance by employing knowledge synthesis. Innovation moderates environmental performance and supplier integration. The results illustrate that reactive and preventive dimensions of Supply Chain Resilience (SCR) have a decisive role in environmental performance.

Keywords:

Supply chain integration, Environmental performance, Knowledge combination, Resilience, Innovation, Green supply chain

References

  1. [1] Onofrei, M., Vatamanu, A. F., & Cigu, E. (2022). The relationship between economic growth and CO2 emissions in EU countries: A cointegration analysis. Frontiers in environmental science, 10, 934885. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.934885
  2. [2] de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Vazquez-Brust, D., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Latan, H. (2017). Green supply chain practices and environmental performance in Brazil: Survey, case studies, and implications for B2B. Industrial marketing management, 66, 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.05.003
  3. [3] Boskabadi, A., Mirmozaffari, M., Yazdani, R., & Farahani, A. (2022). Design of a distribution network in a multi-product, multi-period green supply chain system under demand uncertainty. Sustainable operations and computers, 3, 226–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.01.005
  4. [4] Zimmermann, R., Soares, A., & Roca, J. B. (2024). The moderator effect of balance of power on the relationships between the adoption of digital technologies in supply chain management processes and innovation performance in SMEs. Industrial marketing management, 118, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.02.004
  5. [5] Negri, M., Cagno, E., Colicchia, C., & Sarkis, J. (2021). Integrating sustainability and resilience in the supply chain: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Business strategy and the environment, 30(7), 2858–2886. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2776
  6. [6] Kazancoglu, I., Ozbiltekin-Pala, M., Mangla, S. K., Kazancoglu, Y., & Jabeen, F. (2022). Role of flexibility, agility and responsiveness for sustainable supply chain resilience during COVID-19. Journal of cleaner production, 362, 132431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132431
  7. [7] Dangelico, R. M., & Pujari, D. (2010). Mainstreaming green product innovation: Why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of business ethics, 95(3), 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0434-0
  8. [8] Du, L., Zhang, Z., & Feng, T. (2018). Linking green customer and supplier integration with green innovation performance: The role of internal integration. Business strategy and the environment, 27(8), 1583–1595. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2223
  9. [9] Burki, U. (2018). Green supply chain management, green innovations, and green practices. In Innovative solutions for sustainable supply chains (pp. 81–109). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94322-0_4
  10. [10] Chen, Y. J., Korpeoglu, C. G., Korpeoglu, E., Sahin, O., Tang, C. S., Xiao, S., & others. (2018). Innovative online platforms: Research opportunities. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2018.0757
  11. [11] Sezen, B., & Cankaya, S. Y. (2013). Effects of green manufacturing and eco-innovation on sustainability performance. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 99, 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.481
  12. [12] Pacheco, L. M., Alves, M. F. R., & Liboni, L. B. (2018). Green absorptive capacity: A mediation-moderation model of knowledge for innovation. Business strategy and the environment, 27(8), 1502–1513. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2208
  13. [13] Morse, S. (2018). Relating environmental performance of nation states to income and income inequality. Sustainable development, 26(1), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1693
  14. [14] Song, Y., Cai, J., & Feng, T. (2017). The influence of green supply chain integration on firm performance: A contingency and configuration perspective. Sustainability, 9(5), 763. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050763
  15. [15] Cheng, J. H., & Lu, K. L. (2017). Enhancing effects of supply chain resilience: insights from trajectory and resource-based perspectives. Supply chain management: An international journal, 22(4), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-06-2016-0190
  16. [16] Huang, J. W., & Li, Y. H. (2017). Green innovation and performance: The view of organizational capability and social reciprocity. Journal of business ethics, 145(2), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2903-y
  17. [17] Soni, U., Jain, V., & Kumar, S. (2014). Measuring supply chain resilience using a deterministic modeling approach. Computers & industrial engineering, 74, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.04.019
  18. [18] Jafar-nejad, P., Powers, B., Soriano, A., Zhao, H., Norris, D., Matson, J., … & Rigo, F. (2020). The atlas of RNase H antisense oligonucleotide distribution and activity in the CNS of rodents and non-human primates following central administration. Nucleic acids research, 49. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1235
  19. [19] Claver, E., Lopez, M. D., Molina, J. F., & Tari, J. J. (2007). Environmental management and firm performance: A case study. Journal of environmental management, 84(4), 606-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.09.012
  20. [20] Kamalahmadi, M., & Parast, M. M. (2016). A review of the literature on the principles of enterprise and supply chain resilience: Major findings and directions for future research. International journal of production economics, 171, 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.10.023
  21. [21] Yao, C. L., & Wang, L.Y. (2024). Corporate sustainable development performance through top management team’s transactive memory system and organizational resilience: A moderated mediation analysis. Heliyon, 10(3). https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(24)00705-9
  22. [22] Zhang, Q., Pan, J., Jiang, Y., & Feng, T. (2020). The impact of green supplier integration on firm performance: The mediating role of social capital accumulation. Journal of purchasing and supply management, 26(2), 100579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2019.100579
  23. [23] Eltayeb, T. K., Zailani, S., & Ramayah, T. (2011). Green supply chain initiatives among certified companies in Malaysia and environmental sustainability: Investigating the outcomes. Resources, conservation and recycling, 55(5), 495–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.09.003
  24. [24] Abbas, A., Luo, X., Wattoo, M. U., & Hu, R. (2022). Organizational behavior in green supply chain integration: Nexus between information technology capability, green innovation, and organizational performance. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 874639. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874639
  25. [25] Hadi, T., Chaharsooghi, S. K., Sheikhmohammady, M., & Hafezalkotob, A. (2020). Pricing strategy for a green supply chain with hybrid production modes under government intervention. Journal of cleaner production, 268, 121945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121945
  26. [26] Deshmukh, A. J., & Vasudevan, H. (2014). Emerging supplier selection criterion in the context of traditional vs green supply chain management. International journal of managing value and supply chains, 5(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijmvsc.2014.5103
  27. [27] Sulistio, J., & Rini, T. A. (2015). A structural literature review on models and methods analysis of green supply chain management. Procedia manufacturing, 4(2015), 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.11.043
  28. [28] Wang, G., Feng, T., Zhao, X., & Song, Y. (2018). Influence of supplier trust and relationship commitment on green supplier integration. Sustainable development, 26(6), 879–889. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1857
  29. [29] Calzolari, T., Bimpizas-Pinis, M., Genovese, A., & Brint, A. (2023). Understanding the relationship between institutional pressures, supply chain integration and the adoption of circular economy practices. Journal of cleaner production, 432, 139686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139686
  30. [30] Yu, Y., & Huo, B. (2019). The impact of environmental orientation on supplier green management and financial performance: The moderating role of relational capital. Journal of cleaner production, 211, 628–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.198
  31. [31] Pham, T., & Pham, H. (2021). Improving green performance of construction projects through supply chain integration: The role of environmental knowledge. Sustainable production and consumption, 26, 933–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.01.004
  32. [32] Chiou, T. Y., Chan, H. K., Lettice, F., & Chung, S. H. (2011). The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transportation research part e: logistics and transportation review, 47(6), 822–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.016
  33. [33] Li, S., Qiao, J., Cui, H., & Wang, S. (2020). Realizing the environmental benefits of proactive environmental strategy: The roles of green supply chain integration and relational capability. Sustainability, 12(7), 2907. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072907
  34. [34] Hamidieh, A., & Arshadikhamseh, A. (2021). The flexible possibilistic-robust mathematical programming approach for the resilient supply chain network: An operational plan. Journal of advanced manufacturing systems, 20(03), 473–498. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219686721500220
  35. [35] Piprani, A. Z., Khan, S. A. R., Salim, R., & Khalilur Rahman, M. (2023). Unlocking sustainable supply chain performance through dynamic data analytics: a multiple mediation model of sustainable innovation and supply chain resilience. Environmental science and pollution research, 30(39), 90615–90638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28507-8
  36. [36] Shin, N., & Park, S. (2021). Supply chain leadership driven strategic resilience capabilities management: A leader-member exchange perspective. Journal of business research, 122, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.056
  37. [37] Qadir, T., Amin, A., Sharma, P. K., Jeelani, I., & Abe, H. (2022). A review on medicinally important heterocyclic compounds. The open medicinal chemistry journal, 16(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/18741045-v16-e2202280
  38. [38] Belhadi, A., Kamble, S. S., Venkatesh, M., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Benkhati, I. (2022). Building supply chain resilience and efficiency through additive manufacturing: An ambidextrous perspective on the dynamic capability view. International journal of production economics, 249, 108516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108516
  39. [39] Ivanov, D. (2022). Probability, adaptability and time: Some research-practice paradoxes in supply chain resilience and viability modelling. International journal of integrated supply management, 15(4), 454–465. https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijisma/v15y2022i4p454-465.html
  40. [40] Lechner, G., & others. (2019). Supplier relationship management: Small, non-replaceable suppliers and close customer-supplier relationships. Open journal of business and management, 7(03), 1451. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2019.73099
  41. [41] Wong, C. Y., Wong, C. W. Y., & Boon-Itt, S. (2015). Integrating environmental management into supply chains: a systematic literature review and theoretical framework. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 45(1/2), 43–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-05-2013-0110
  42. [42] Ji, L., Yuan, C., Feng, T., & Wang, C. (2020). Achieving the environmental profits of green supplier integration: The roles of supply chain resilience and knowledge combination. Sustainable development, 28(4), 978–989. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2050
  43. [43] Tarigan, Z. J. H., Siagian, H., & Jie, F. (2021). Impact of internal integration, supply chain partnership, supply chain agility, and supply chain resilience on sustainable advantage. Sustainability, 13(10), 5460. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105460
  44. [44] Moreira, A. C., Ribau, C. P., & Rodrigues, C. da S. F. (2022). Green supply chain practices in the plastics industry in Portugal. The moderating effects of traceability, ecocentricity, environmental culture, environmental uncertainty, competitive pressure, and social responsibility. Cleaner logistics and supply chain, 5, 100088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2022.100088
  45. [45] Meixiang Wu, Chengdong Shi, Q. S. (2019). Supply chain pricing decisions under corporation social responsibility. International journal of advanced engineering, management and science, 5(8). https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijaems.58.2
  46. [46] Jiang, W., Rosati, F., Chai, H., & Feng, T. (2020). Market orientation practices enhancing corporate environmental performance via knowledge creation: does environmental management system implementation matter? Business strategy and the environment, 29(5), 1899–1924. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2478
  47. [47] Sambasivan, M., Loke, S. P., & Abidin-Mohamed, Z. (2009). Impact of knowledge management in supply chain management: a study in Malaysian manufacturing companies. Knowledge and process management, 16(3), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.328
  48. [48] Lim, M. K., Tseng, M. L., Tan, K. H., & Bui, T. D. (2017). Knowledge management in sustainable supply chain management: Improving performance through an interpretive structural modelling approach. Journal of cleaner production, 162, 806–816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.056
  49. [49] Pérez-Luño, A., Alegre, J., & Valle-Cabrera, R. (2019). The role of tacit knowledge in connecting knowledge exchange and combination with innovation. Technology analysis & strategic management, 31(2), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1492712
  50. [50] Maulini, Y., Maulina, E., Purnomo, M., & Rizal, M. (2022). Knowledge integration and entrepreneurial capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage through supply chain management. Uncertain supply chain management, 10(2), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2022.1.005
  51. [51] Marques, L., Yan, T., & Matthews, L. (2020). Knowledge diffusion in a global supply network: A network of practice view. Journal of supply chain management, 56(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12214
  52. [52] Zhang, Q., Pan, J., & Feng, T. (2020). Green supplier integration and environmental performance: do environmental innovation and ambidextrous governance matter? International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 50(7/8), 693–719. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-01-2020-0027
  53. [53] Seman, N. A. A., Govindan, K., Mardani, A., Zakuan, N., Saman, M. Z. M., Hooker, R. E., & Ozkul, S. (2019). The mediating effect of green innovation on the relationship between green supply chain management and environmental performance. Journal of cleaner production, 229, 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.211
  54. [54] Gupta, H., & Barua, M. K. (2017). Supplier selection among SMEs on the basis of their green innovation ability using BWM and Fuzzy TOPSIS. Journal of cleaner production, 152, 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.125
  55. [55] Ameer, F., & Khan, N. R. (2023). Green entrepreneurial orientation and corporate environmental performance: A systematic literature review. European management journal, 41(5), 755–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.04.003
  56. [56] Guo, Y., Wang, L., & Xie, Y. (2018). Green innovation, green entrepreneurial orientation and supply chain learning: evidence from manufacturing firms in China. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/201805.0232
  57. [57] Yu, Y., Zhang, M., & Huo, B. (2019). The impact of supply chain quality integration on green supply chain management and environmental performance. Total quality management & business excellence, 30(9–10), 1110–1125. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1356684
  58. [58] Aboelmaged, M. (2018). Direct and indirect effects of eco-innovation, environmental orientation and supplier collaboration on hotel performance: An empirical study. Journal of cleaner production, 184, 537–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.192
  59. [59] Peng, H., Shen, N., Liao, H., & Wang, Q. (2020). Multiple network embedding, green knowledge integration and green supply chain performance—Investigation based on agglomeration scenario. Journal of cleaner production, 259, 120821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120821
  60. [60] Ebrahim Farbod Alireza Hamidieh. (2022). Investigating the impact of green supply chain on economic performance: a neural network and structural equations approach. Decision making and operations research, 7(2), 316–338. https://www.journal-dmor.ir/article_145038_cdd8c2f2107c894a6a036c0958c43312.pdf
  61. [61] Hsu, S. H., Chen, W., & Hsieh, M. (2006). Robustness testing of PLS, LISREL, EQS and ANN-based SEM for measuring customer satisfaction. Total quality management & business excellence, 17(3), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360500451465
  62. [62] Hackl, P., & Westlund, A. H. (2000). On structural equation modelling for customer satisfaction measurement. Total quality management, 11(4–6), 820–825. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544120050008264
  63. [63] Garson, G. D. (2016). Partial least squares. Regression and structural equation models. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16017-6
  64. [64] Paillé, P., Chen, Y., Boiral, O., & Jin, J. (2014). The impact of human resource management on environmental performance: An employee-level study. Journal of business ethics, 121(3), 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1732-0
  65. [65] Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. (2013). Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices. Journal of purchasing and supply management, 19(2), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2012.12.001
  66. [66] Shu, C., Page, A. L., Gao, S., & Jiang, X. (2012). Managerial ties and firm innovation: is knowledge creation a missing link? Journal of product innovation management, 29(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00883.x
  67. [67] Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2008). Environmental management and manufacturing performance: The role of collaboration in the supply chain. International journal of production economics, 111(2), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.030
  68. [68] Wu, G. C. (2013). The influence of green supply chain integration and environmental uncertainty on green innovation in Taiwan’s IT industry. Supply chain management: an international journal, 18(5), 539–552. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-06-2012-0201
  69. [69] Vinzi, V. E., Trinchera, L., & Amato, S. (2009). PLS path modeling: from foundations to recent developments and open issues for model assessment and improvement. Handbook of partial least squares: concepts, methods and applications, 47–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_3
  70. [70] Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS quarterly, 177–195. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284
  71. [71] Haji-Othman, Y., & Yusuff, M. S. S. (2022). Assessing reliability and validity of attitude construct using partial least squares structural equation modeling. Int j acad res bus soc sci, 12(5), 378–385. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Yusuf-Haji-Othman/publication/360465308
  72. [72] Hassan, S. H., Ramayah, T., Mohamed, O., & Maghsoudi, A. (2015). E-Lifestyle conceptualization: Measurement model validation using variance based structural equation modeling (SEM-PLS). Modern applied science, 9(2), 307–319. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Siti-Hassan-8/publication/272431492
  73. [73] Karunasingha, D. S. K. (2022). Root mean square error or mean absolute error? Use their ratio as well. Information sciences, 585, 609–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.11.036
  74. [74] Li, L., Shan, S., Dai, J., Che, W., & Shou, Y. (2022). The impact of green supply chain management on green innovation: A meta-analysis from the inter-organizational learning perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 250, 108622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108622

Downloads

Published

2025-06-27

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Transactions on Quantitative Finance and Beyond

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Transactions on Quantitative Finance and Beyond

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Hamidieh, A., & Farbod, E. (2025). The Importance of Supply Chain Integration in Environmental Performance: A mediation-moderation model of Knowledge Combination, Resilience and Green Innovation. Transactions on Quantitative Finance and Beyond, 2(2), 120-141. https://doi.org/10.22105/tqfb.v2i2.66
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Similar Articles

11-19 of 19

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.